RYPMX vs. UNWPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX).
RYPMX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1993. UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985.
Performance
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 9.00% | 148.94% | 10.14% | 4.24% | -10.57% | -8.96% | 34.25% | 52.91% | -16.56% | 7.04% |
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -41.34% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYPMX achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than UNWPX's -41.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RYPMX has outperformed UNWPX with an annualized return of 17.64%, while UNWPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.
RYPMX
- 1D
- 7.50%
- 1M
- -20.71%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 24.38%
- 1Y
- 110.34%
- 3Y*
- 41.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
UNWPX
- 1D
- -37.54%
- 1M
- -53.72%
- YTD
- -41.34%
- 6M
- -32.73%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- -6.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYPMX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than UNWPX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYPMX vs. UNWPX — Risk / Return Rank
RYPMX
UNWPX
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYPMX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 0.25 | +2.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 0.64 | +1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.13 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 0.26 | +3.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.15 | 1.77 | +11.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYPMX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 0.25 | +2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.19 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.05 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.05 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYPMX and UNWPX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Dividend Comparison
RYPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than UNWPX's 10.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 2.76% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 7.15% | 6.39% | 1.06% | 2.08% | 1.35% | 5.53% | 4.04% | 0.58% |
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 10.15% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
Drawdowns
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYPMX drawdown since its inception was -81.25%, roughly equal to the maximum UNWPX drawdown of -83.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPMX and UNWPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYPMX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.25% | -83.78% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.86% | -53.72% | +22.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.83% | -64.16% | +17.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | -69.19% | +21.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.00% | -66.94% | +45.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.48% | -49.57% | +9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 7.92% | +0.51% |
Volatility
RYPMX vs. UNWPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) is 18.25%, while U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a volatility of 47.77%. This indicates that RYPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYPMX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.25% | 47.77% | -29.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.56% | 57.55% | -18.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.16% | 54.52% | -8.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 34.32% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.32% | 32.29% | +5.03% |