RYPMX vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
RYPMX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1993. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
RYPMX vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYPMX vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 1.40% | 148.94% | 10.14% | 4.24% | -10.57% | -8.96% | 34.25% | 52.91% | -16.56% | 7.04% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYPMX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than CEF's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RYPMX has outperformed CEF with an annualized return of 16.79%, while CEF has yielded a comparatively lower 15.03% annualized return.
RYPMX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -26.51%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 95.65%
- 3Y*
- 37.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.79%
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYPMX vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYPMX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYPMX vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
RYPMX
CEF
RYPMX vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYPMX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 1.83 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.12 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.61 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 9.68 | +1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYPMX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.83 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.93 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.23 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYPMX and CEF is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RYPMX vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
RYPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 2.96% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 7.15% | 6.39% | 1.06% | 2.08% | 1.35% | 5.53% | 4.04% | 0.58% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
RYPMX vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYPMX drawdown since its inception was -81.25%, which is greater than CEF's maximum drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPMX and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYPMX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.25% | -62.29% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.86% | -26.77% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.83% | -26.77% | -20.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | -29.10% | -18.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.51% | -19.41% | -7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.48% | -27.38% | -13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 7.23% | +1.10% |
Volatility
RYPMX vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) at 14.73%. This indicates that RYPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYPMX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.06% | 14.73% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.91% | 35.36% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.69% | 37.38% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.30% | 23.78% | +12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.25% | 21.58% | +15.67% |