RYPMX vs. MIDSX
RYPMX (Rydex Precious Metals Fund) and MIDSX (Midas Fund) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 10 years, RYPMX returned 12.58%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for MIDSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYPMX charges 1.26%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for MIDSX.
Performance
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYPMX achieves a -6.15% return, which is significantly lower than MIDSX's -5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, RYPMX has outperformed MIDSX with an annualized return of 12.58%, while MIDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.27% annualized return.
RYPMX
- 1D
- -4.66%
- 1M
- -8.61%
- YTD
- -6.15%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 57.95%
- 3Y*
- 39.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
MIDSX
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- -9.59%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -9.34%
- 1Y
- 58.65%
- 3Y*
- 43.79%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | -6.15% | 148.94% | 10.14% | 4.24% | -10.57% | -8.96% | 34.25% | 52.91% | -16.56% | 7.04% |
MIDSX Midas Fund | -5.44% | 195.76% | 7.27% | -1.79% | -11.11% | -19.23% | 10.64% | 30.56% | -12.90% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYPMX and MIDSX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 1995 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RYPMX and MIDSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYPMX vs. MIDSX — Risk / Return Rank
RYPMX
MIDSX
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) and Midas Fund (MIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYPMX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.47 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 4.24 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYPMX drawdown since its inception was -81.25%, smaller than the maximum MIDSX drawdown of -89.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYPMX and MIDSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYPMX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.25% | -89.77% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.22% | -37.99% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.22% | -37.99% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.46% | -43.33% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | -57.07% | +9.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.98% | -45.58% | +13.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -63.48% | +23.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.53% | 13.17% | +0.36% |
Volatility
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) is 17.35%, while Midas Fund (MIDSX) has a volatility of 18.36%. This indicates that RYPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYPMX | MIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.35% | 18.36% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.16% | 39.68% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.95% | 46.39% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.41% | 35.10% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.26% | 33.61% | +3.65% |
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYPMX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDSX's 4.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYPMX vs. MIDSX - Dividend Comparison
RYPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYPMX Rydex Precious Metals Fund | 3.20% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 3.51% | 7.15% | 6.39% | 1.06% | 2.08% | 1.35% | 5.53% | 4.04% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, RYPMX and MIDSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MIDSX has higher volatility (18.36%) compared to RYPMX (17.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYPMX dropped -81.25% vs MIDSX's -89.77%.
MIDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYPMX and MIDSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer