PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. HYTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYLD vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than HYTI's 1.74% return.


RYLD

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.51%
6M
8.37%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*

HYTI

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYLD vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and HYTI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.53

The correlation between RYLD and HYTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLD vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYLDHYTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.56

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

10.78

+2.59

RYLD vs. HYTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the HYTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and HYTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and HYTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDHYTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-4.47%

-37.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-2.38%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.31%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-0.45%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.56%

+0.99%

Volatility

RYLD vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.06%. This indicates that RYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYLDHYTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.06%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

3.10%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

3.86%

+6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

5.17%

+8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

5.17%

+11.98%

RYLD vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYLD vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than HYTI's 10.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
10.41%8.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.73%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYLD and HYTI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYLD has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to HYTI (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs HYTI's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 20.74% vs 6.07% for HYTI. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYTI.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 10.41% for HYTI.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RYLD and 0.65% for HYTI.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYLD and HYTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer