RYLD vs. DBO
RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RYLD returned 3.43%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for DBO. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
RYLD vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 13.48% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return.
RYLD
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 26.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.95%
DBO
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- 17.71%
- 6M
- 53.16%
- YTD
- 66.72%
- 1Y
- 51.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.34M | $10.71M | $13.49M | |
| $9.87M | $9.43M | $9.08M |
RYLD vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 13.48% | 5.65% | 10.13% | 0.27% | -13.03% | 22.13% | -0.44% | 8.86% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 66.72% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYLD and DBO is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | 0.18 |
The correlation between RYLD and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYLD vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
RYLD
DBO
RYLD vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYLD | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.23 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 1.86 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.17 | 5.64 | +11.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYLD vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYLD | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.53% | -90.18% | +48.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -27.73% | +21.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -28.20% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.33% | -37.68% | +16.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -56.13% | +56.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -62.20% | +53.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 9.16% | -7.63% |
Volatility
RYLD vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 2.30%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYLD | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 18.99% | -16.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 34.30% | -26.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 38.86% | -28.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 33.43% | -19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 32.24% | -15.20% |
RYLD vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYLD vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than DBO's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.11% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.50% | 12.00% | 12.03% | 12.64% | 13.49% | 12.35% | 10.76% | 6.43% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYLD and DBO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to RYLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 13.64% vs 3.43% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 2.11% for DBO.
RYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RYLD and 0.78% for DBO.
RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYLD and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer