PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. ARR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYLD vs. ARR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than ARR's 3.25% return.


RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.78%
YTD
8.33%
6M
9.14%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*

ARR

1D
-1.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
3.25%
6M
5.75%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-8.20%
10Y*
-3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYLD vs. ARR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
8.33%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%8.92%
ARR
ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
3.25%11.69%13.17%-15.43%-32.01%1.11%-33.13%-2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and ARR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. ARR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ARR
ARR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ARR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ARR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLD vs. ARR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYLDARRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.41

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

3.97

+9.89

RYLD vs. ARR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the ARR Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and ARR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYLDARRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.02

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

-0.28

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.11

+0.42

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. ARR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, smaller than the maximum ARR drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and ARR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDARRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-80.12%

+38.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-16.79%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-45.79%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-66.68%

+45.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-61.49%

+61.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-33.12%

+24.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

5.95%

-4.40%

Volatility

RYLD vs. ARR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 2.02%, while ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYLDARRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

5.11%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

18.00%

-10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

23.43%

-12.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

29.04%

-15.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

34.21%

-17.01%

Dividends

RYLD vs. ARR - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, less than ARR's 16.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARR
ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
16.87%16.28%15.27%25.88%21.31%12.23%11.12%12.09%11.12%8.86%13.92%17.88%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.65%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYLD and ARR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARR has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to RYLD (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs ARR's -80.12%.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYLD and ARR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer