PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYKKY vs. TFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RYKKY vs. TFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd (RYKKY) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYKKY achieves a 37.11% return, which is significantly higher than TFC's -1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RYKKY has outperformed TFC with an annualized return of 7.67%, while TFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.


RYKKY

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.98%
YTD
37.11%
6M
28.23%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
69.30%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
7.67%

TFC

1D
-1.45%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-1.64%
6M
2.08%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
6.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYKKY vs. TFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYKKY
Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd
37.11%55.11%44.20%39.05%-24.36%-25.37%-12.26%-3.07%-23.11%60.04%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
-1.64%19.05%23.72%-8.59%-23.53%26.08%-11.16%34.55%-10.24%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RYKKY and TFC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2014

0.15

The correlation between RYKKY and TFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RYKKY:

$12.92B

TFC:

$60.06B

EPS

RYKKY:

$56.18

TFC:

$4.28

PE Ratio

RYKKY:

0.22

TFC:

11.07

PEG Ratio

RYKKY:

0.01

TFC:

1.30

PS Ratio

RYKKY:

0.02

TFC:

2.01

PB Ratio

RYKKY:

0.03

TFC:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

RYKKY:

$842.01B

TFC:

$30.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RYKKY:

$437.97B

TFC:

$19.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

RYKKY:

$117.46B

TFC:

$6.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYKKY vs. TFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYKKY
RYKKY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RYKKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYKKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYKKY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RYKKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYKKY Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TFC
TFC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYKKY vs. TFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd (RYKKY) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYKKYTFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.18

1.20

+0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.22

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

3.26

-1.82

RYKKY vs. TFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYKKY Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the TFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYKKY and TFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYKKYTFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

1.10

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.00

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.21

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.28

-0.19

Drawdowns

RYKKY vs. TFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYKKY drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than TFC's maximum drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYKKY and TFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYKKYTFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-66.56%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.31%

-20.67%

-57.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.31%

-26.93%

-51.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.31%

-59.11%

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.61%

-59.11%

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-13.27%

+8.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-13.84%

-20.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.23%

7.71%

+12.52%

Volatility

RYKKY vs. TFC - Volatility Comparison

Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd (RYKKY) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) at 7.29%. This indicates that RYKKY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYKKYTFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.63%

7.29%

+10.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.13%

17.12%

+31.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

492.98%

23.04%

+469.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

225.71%

31.86%

+193.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

161.34%

33.60%

+127.74%

Dividends

RYKKY vs. TFC - Dividend Comparison

RYKKY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYKKY
Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd
0.00%0.43%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.45%1.29%0.00%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
4.39%4.23%4.79%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%

Financials

RYKKY vs. TFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd and Truist Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
211.18B
7.41B
(RYKKY) Total Revenue
(TFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RYKKY vs. TFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd and Truist Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
52.1%
63.1%
Portfolio components
RYKKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 110.06B and revenue of 211.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.

TFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.67B and revenue of 7.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.1%.

RYKKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd reported an operating income of 16.73B and revenue of 211.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

TFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.8%.

RYKKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ryohin Keikaku Co Ltd reported a net income of 12.26B and revenue of 211.18B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

TFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 7.41B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RYKKY and TFC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYKKY has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to TFC (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYKKY dropped -78.61% vs TFC's -66.56%.

TFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYKKY and TFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer