RYJ vs. SPHQ
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RYJ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RYJ returned 10.38%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RYJ has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.38%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 13.31% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and SPHQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.77 |
The correlation between RYJ and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RYJ
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RYJ
SPHQ
Industrials
RYJ
SPHQ
Utilities
RYJ
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
RYJ
SPHQ
Technology
RYJ
SPHQ
Communication Services
RYJ
SPHQ
Healthcare
RYJ
SPHQ
Energy
RYJ
SPHQ
Basic Materials
RYJ
SPHQ
Financial Services
RYJ
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
RYJ
-
SPHQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
SPHQ
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.88 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.73 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.70 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 11.50 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.88 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.90 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.84 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -57.83% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -8.90% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -16.57% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -25.04% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -31.60% | -18.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -10.70% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.08% | +0.84% |
Volatility
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.55%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 3.55% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 10.20% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 12.62% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 16.45% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 17.87% | +3.78% |
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to SPHQ (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.98% vs 10.38% for RYJ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.
RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.
RYJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer