PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYJ vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RYJ has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.38%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.


RYJ

1D
0.34%
1M
6.49%
YTD
11.22%
6M
12.45%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
10.38%

SPHQ

1D
1.26%
1M
6.56%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.32%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYJ
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF
11.22%8.89%13.28%15.65%-13.17%24.09%6.21%32.02%-14.84%13.31%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.16%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RYJ and SPHQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006

0.77

The correlation between RYJ and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RYJ
SPHQ

Consumer Defensive

23.3%
15.4%

Industrials

20.7%
24.3%

Utilities

12.5%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
4.6%

Technology

9.8%
28.1%

Communication Services

7.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.4%

Energy

4.1%
0.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%
2.2%

Financial Services

-

13.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Consumer Defensive

RYJ
23.3%
SPHQ
15.4%

Industrials

RYJ
20.7%
SPHQ
24.3%

Utilities

RYJ
12.5%
SPHQ
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RYJ
12.2%
SPHQ
4.6%

Technology

RYJ
9.8%
SPHQ
28.1%

Communication Services

RYJ
7.7%
SPHQ
2.0%

Healthcare

RYJ
5.8%
SPHQ
8.4%

Energy

RYJ
4.1%
SPHQ
0.7%

Basic Materials

RYJ
4.0%
SPHQ
2.2%

Financial Services

RYJ

-

SPHQ
13.3%

Real Estate

RYJ

-

SPHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYJ vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYJ
RYJ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYJSPHQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.88

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

2.73

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.70

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.46

11.50

-5.04

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYJ and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYJSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.88

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.90

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.84

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.53

-0.19

Drawdowns

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYJSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.74%

-57.83%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-8.90%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-16.57%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-25.04%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.20%

-31.60%

-18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-10.70%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.08%

+0.84%

Volatility

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.55%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYJSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.55%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

10.20%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

12.62%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

16.45%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

17.87%

+3.78%

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYJ vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYJ
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF
1.57%1.75%1.28%1.39%0.72%0.52%0.28%0.20%1.43%0.00%1.55%0.93%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYJ and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to SPHQ (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.98% vs 10.38% for RYJ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.

RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

RYJ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYJ and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer