RYIPX vs. SQLV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RYIPX (Royce International Premier Fund) and SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) are both funds - RYIPX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Royce Investment Partners, while SQLV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, RYIPX returned -4.90%/yr vs 6.91%/yr for SQLV. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RYIPX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SQLV.

Performance

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce International Premier Fund (RYIPX) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYIPX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than SQLV's 17.82% return.

RYIPX

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 6M: -1.37%
• 1Y: -5.04%
• 3Y*: 1.21%
• 5Y*: -4.90%
• 10Y*: 4.69%

SQLV

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 15.87%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYIPX Royce International Premier Fund	-1.11%	9.37%	-7.37%	7.68%	-27.27%	5.77%	15.74%	34.22%	-12.76%	14.70%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	17.82%	2.50%	4.76%	21.21%	-12.86%	37.14%	7.13%	17.41%	-10.55%	8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between RYIPX and SQLV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017	0.48

The correlation between RYIPX and SQLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYIPX vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYIPX

RYIPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
RYIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
RYIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RYIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
RYIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
RYIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 60
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce International Premier Fund (RYIPX) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYIPX	SQLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	1.66	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.33	2.42	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.28	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	3.31	-3.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	9.92	-10.48

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYIPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the SQLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYIPX and SQLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYIPX drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, smaller than the maximum SQLV drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYIPX and SQLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYIPX	SQLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.14%	-48.34%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.68%	-8.84%	-7.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.41%	-26.86%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.14%	-26.86%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.38%	0.00%	-28.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.40%	-8.89%	-3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.05%	2.95%	+4.10%

Volatility

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce International Premier Fund (RYIPX) is 4.15%, while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that RYIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYIPX	SQLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	4.58%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	11.58%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	17.70%	-4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	20.98%	-5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.09%	23.32%	-8.23%

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYIPX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SQLV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYIPX vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison

RYIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SQLV's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYIPX Royce International Premier Fund	0.80%	0.79%	4.10%	2.18%	3.18%	4.51%	0.00%	0.20%	0.00%	0.71%	2.40%	2.61%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	1.00%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYIPX and SQLV in my portfolio?

RYIPX and SQLV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYIPX or SQLV?

SQLV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to RYIPX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYIPX dropped -42.14% vs SQLV's -48.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SQLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.