RYGRX vs. CTCAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) and CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - RYGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Rydex Funds, while CTCAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX returned 13.20%/yr vs 24.75%/yr for CTCAX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYGRX charges 2.26%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for CTCAX.

Performance

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 30.14% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 32.06% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 13.20%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.

RYGRX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 11.15%
• YTD: 30.14%
• 6M: 30.55%
• 1Y: 37.82%
• 3Y*: 25.67%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 13.20%

CTCAX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 17.00%
• YTD: 32.06%
• 6M: 31.15%
• 1Y: 61.81%
• 3Y*: 36.07%
• 5Y*: 20.96%
• 10Y*: 24.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	30.14%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A	32.06%	24.78%	31.39%	56.46%	-34.81%	22.73%	49.46%	43.91%	-1.48%	42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and CTCAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005	0.89

The correlation between RYGRX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 55
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

CTCAX

CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 83
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	3.04	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.68	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.49	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	4.43	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.56	16.56	-3.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	3.04	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.81	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	1.00	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.78	-0.34

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and CTCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.22%	-61.04%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-14.43%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.95%	-26.67%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.57%	-39.55%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.63%	-39.55%	+2.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-10.68%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	3.86%	-0.95%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) have volatilities of 6.39% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYGRX	CTCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	6.37%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.30%	16.72%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.71%	21.06%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.50%	25.98%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	24.84%	-1.96%

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYGRX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than CTCAX's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A	2.49%	3.29%	1.08%	2.36%	3.53%	4.15%	0.91%	2.55%	5.82%	3.52%	0.36%	1.80%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.91%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYGRX and CTCAX in my portfolio?

RYGRX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYGRX or CTCAX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to CTCAX (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.