PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. RDVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly lower than RDVT's 16.75% return.


RYCEY

1D
-1.25%
1M
-3.36%
6M
4.11%
YTD
15.83%
1Y
33.75%
3Y*
111.25%
5Y*
68.92%
10Y*
7.64%
ALL TIME*
-11.47%

RDVT

1D
1.96%
1M
20.67%
6M
32.45%
YTD
16.75%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
47.32%
5Y*
23.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
15.83%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-13.13%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
16.75%58.63%81.27%-13.25%-42.00%52.01%41.06%174.63%-76.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and RDVT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RYCEY:

$150.95B

RDVT:

$938.10M

EPS

RYCEY:

£0.99

RDVT:

$0.97

PE Ratio

RYCEY:

13.56

RDVT:

68.23

PEG Ratio

RYCEY:

0.03

RDVT:

0.13

PS Ratio

RYCEY:

2.83

RDVT:

10.23

PB Ratio

RYCEY:

41.62

RDVT:

9.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

RYCEY:

£40.04B

RDVT:

$94.08M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RYCEY:

£10.10B

RDVT:

$79.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

RYCEY:

£8.04B

RDVT:

$23.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. RDVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCEYRDVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.11

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

2.52

+1.80

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the RDVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and RDVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than RDVT's maximum drawdown of -90.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and RDVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEYRDVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-90.17%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-42.11%

+20.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-42.11%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-63.73%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.01%

-3.23%

-73.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.09%

-49.83%

-34.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.83%

18.46%

-10.63%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) is 8.23%, while Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that RYCEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEYRDVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

11.06%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.05%

36.89%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.40%

45.88%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.23%

49.32%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.27%

71.08%

-21.81%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
0.00%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.70%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Red Violet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.64B
25.83M
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
(RDVT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RYCEY values in GBP, RDVT values in USD

RYCEY vs. RDVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Red Violet, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
27.4%
85.2%
Portfolio components
RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

RDVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.01M and revenue of 25.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

RDVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

RDVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a net income of 4.39M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and RDVT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVT has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to RYCEY (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs RDVT's -90.17%.

RDVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and RDVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer