RY.TO vs. SLB
RY.TO (Royal Bank of Canada) and SLB (Schlumberger Limited) are both stocks. RY.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while SLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, RY.TO returned 18.12%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for SLB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RY.TO vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RY.TO is traded in CAD, while SLB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RY.TO achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 51.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RY.TO has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 18.12%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.51% annualized return.
RY.TO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 10.50%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 6M
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 65.59%
- 3Y*
- 35.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.56%
- 10Y*
- 18.12%
SLB
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 51.01%
- 6M
- 46.06%
- 1Y
- 63.39%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 0.51%
RY.TO vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RY.TO Royal Bank of Canada | 20.87% | 39.60% | 34.37% | 9.80% | -1.52% | 33.09% | 6.52% | 14.33% | -5.50% | 17.12% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 51.01% | -1.44% | -18.07% | -3.14% | 92.63% | 40.23% | -45.15% | 12.88% | -40.01% | -22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between RY.TO and SLB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.34 |
The correlation between RY.TO and SLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RY.TO:
CA$15.77
SLB:
$3.04
RY.TO:
17.69
SLB:
18.45
RY.TO:
2.60
SLB:
0.87
RY.TO:
3.25
SLB:
1.70
RY.TO:
CA$120.33B
SLB:
$35.94B
RY.TO:
CA$65.64B
SLB:
$4.90B
RY.TO:
CA$14.74B
SLB:
$5.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RY.TO vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank
RY.TO
SLB
RY.TO vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RY.TO | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.32 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.91 | 4.51 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.39 | 12.57 | +16.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RY.TO vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RY.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.03%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -83.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RY.TO and SLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RY.TO | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.03% | -83.52% | +29.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -14.64% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -44.78% | +28.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.21% | -44.78% | +23.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -83.13% | +49.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.02% | +13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -28.40% | +21.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 5.24% | -3.06% |
Volatility
RY.TO vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) is 4.23%, while Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that RY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RY.TO | SLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 9.84% | -5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 26.15% | -15.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 33.81% | -19.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 37.98% | -23.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 40.76% | -23.50% |
Dividends
RY.TO vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
RY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than SLB's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RY.TO Royal Bank of Canada | 2.28% | 2.58% | 3.23% | 3.99% | 3.90% | 3.22% | 4.10% | 3.96% | 4.03% | 3.39% | 3.57% | 4.15% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.06% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Financials
RY.TO vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Bank of Canada and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RY.TO vs. SLB - Profitability Comparison
RY.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.52B and revenue of 33.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.
SLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RY.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
SLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
RY.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.95B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
SLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Schlumberger Limited reported a net income of 752.00M and revenue of 8.72B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RY.TO and SLB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RY.TO and SLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer