RXL vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXL returned 12.72%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for TNA. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.

Performance

RXL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXL achieves a -4.01% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 53.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RXL has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 12.72%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.

RXL

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 9.11%
• YTD: -4.01%
• 6M: -2.59%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

TNA

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 8.84%
• YTD: 53.14%
• 6M: 40.13%
• 1Y: 117.40%
• 3Y*: 25.74%
• 5Y*: -6.50%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	-4.01%	19.76%	-2.72%	-3.15%	-15.26%	48.06%	19.24%	40.40%	3.38%	46.92%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	53.14%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RXL and TNA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between RXL and TNA has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RXL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RXL	TNA
Healthcare	78.0%	16.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	15.9%
Basic Materials	-	4.8%
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Energy	-	6.2%
Industrials	-	17.5%
Real Estate	-	6.2%
Technology	-	16.9%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

RXL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXL

RXL Risk / Return Rank: 23
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 68
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RXL	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	2.01	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.48	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.29	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	3.63	-2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.28	11.92	-9.64

RXL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXL Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RXL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXL drawdown since its inception was -67.70%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXL and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXL	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.70%	-88.09%	+20.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.33%	-32.53%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.08%	-65.78%	+29.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.08%	-82.36%	+46.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.00%	-88.09%	+37.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.76%	-35.23%	+22.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-33.92%	+18.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.17%	9.91%	-0.74%

Volatility

RXL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) is 10.03%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 21.54%. This indicates that RXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXL	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.03%	21.54%	-11.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.39%	42.61%	-21.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.32%	58.70%	-28.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.72%	67.57%	-37.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.30%	68.54%	-35.24%

RXL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

RXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than TNA's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	1.51%	1.43%	1.22%	0.18%	0.32%	0.10%	0.15%	0.27%	0.32%	0.11%	0.12%	0.93%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.39%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXL and TNA in my portfolio?

RXL and TNA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RXL or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to RXL (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXL dropped -67.70% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, RXL or TNA?

On 10-year performance, RXL leads with 12.72% vs 8.78% for TNA. On fees, RXL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RXL or TNA?

Over the 10-year period, RXL has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RXL or TNA?

RXL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RXL or TNA?

RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.

What is the main difference between RXL and TNA?

RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXL and 1.14% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.