RXI vs. PEZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) and PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RXI is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while PEZ is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXI returned 9.86%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for PEZ. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEZ.

Performance

RXI vs. PEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXI achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than PEZ's 1.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RXI having a 9.86% annualized return and PEZ not far behind at 9.69%.

RXI

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 4.24%
• 6M: -0.61%
• YTD: -0.35%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 9.86%
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

PEZ

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.83%
• 6M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 9.69%
• ALL TIME*: 8.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	$60.91K	$107.30K	$64.59K
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	$4.84M	$2.90M	$2.10M

RXI vs. PEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	-0.35%	13.16%	17.26%	27.57%	-29.08%	16.32%	24.46%	26.78%	-6.30%	22.94%
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	1.04%	5.40%	20.06%	29.55%	-29.59%	20.35%	38.97%	18.05%	-6.85%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RXI and PEZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.75

The correlation between RXI and PEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

RXI vs. PEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RXI	PEZ
Consumer Cyclical	94.9%	70.1%
Technology	4.1%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	4.4%
Communication Services	0.2%	11.7%
Industrials	0.1%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	7.3%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RXI vs. PEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RXI

RXI Risk / Return Rank: 22
RXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RXI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RXI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

PEZ

PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RXI vs. PEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RXI	PEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	0.29	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	0.56	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.06	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	0.36	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	0.86	+0.76

RXI vs. PEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the PEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXI and PEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RXI vs. PEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXI drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, roughly equal to the maximum PEZ drawdown of -58.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXI and PEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXI	PEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.36%	-58.39%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-15.83%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.64%	-31.48%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.78%	-41.72%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.78%	-52.05%	+16.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-6.36%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-13.81%	+3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	6.67%	-0.66%

Volatility

RXI vs. PEZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) at 4.50%. This indicates that RXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXI	PEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	4.50%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	14.68%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	20.10%	-3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.08%	24.13%	-3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	25.07%	-4.96%

RXI vs. PEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PEZ's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RXI vs. PEZ - Dividend Comparison

RXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than PEZ's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF	0.24%	0.11%	0.12%	0.60%	0.43%	0.23%	0.39%	0.01%	0.40%	0.42%	0.83%	0.64%
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.40%	1.55%	1.07%	1.00%	1.00%	0.89%	0.65%	1.48%	1.73%	1.26%	1.77%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXI and PEZ in my portfolio?

RXI and PEZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RXI or PEZ?

RXI has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to PEZ (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXI dropped -60.36% vs PEZ's -58.39%.

Which ETF is better, RXI or PEZ?

On 10-year performance, RXI leads with 9.86% vs 9.69% for PEZ. On fees, RXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RXI or PEZ?

Over the 10-year period, RXI has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RXI or PEZ?

RXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RXI or PEZ?

RXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.

What is the main difference between RXI and PEZ?

RXI is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PEZ is Momentum. RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index, while PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for RXI and 0.60% for PEZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.