RXD vs. QLD
RXD (ProShares UltraShort Health Care) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - RXD tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Health Care -IND (-200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RXD returned -19.63%/yr vs 32.56%/yr for QLD. Their -0.53 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
RXD vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXD achieves a -10.24% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RXD has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -19.63%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 32.56% annualized return.
RXD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- -10.24%
- 1Y
- -35.49%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -7.59%
- 10Y*
- -19.63%
- ALL TIME*
- -22.75%
QLD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 1Y
- 42.18%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 32.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $408.78M | $399.91M | $439.78M | |
| $208.34K | $158.30K | $97.64K |
RXD vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | -10.24% | -21.66% | 4.83% | 3.25% | 1.20% | -37.97% | -44.25% | -32.44% | -14.33% | -35.24% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 18.94% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXD and QLD is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.53 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RXD and QLD has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.53 to -0.04, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXD vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
RXD
QLD
RXD vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXD | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.18 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.46 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 4.32 | -5.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXD vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXD drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXD and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXD | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.68% | -83.13% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.79% | -25.13% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.58% | -42.29% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.11% | -63.68% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.52% | -63.68% | -27.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.67% | -16.72% | -82.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.00% | -18.11% | -63.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.78% | 8.47% | +17.31% |
Volatility
RXD vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) is 11.80%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that RXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXD | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 13.69% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.09% | 31.99% | -7.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.60% | 38.62% | -7.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 45.76% | -15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 44.97% | -11.82% |
RXD vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RXD and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
RXD vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than QLD's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 3.31% | 3.29% | 4.36% | 3.17% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.73% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXD and QLD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to RXD (11.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXD dropped -99.68% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 32.56% vs -19.63% for RXD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RXD has been the lower-risk option at 11.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 32.56% return vs -19.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXD and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
RXD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.14% for QLD.
RXD tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Health Care -IND (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXD and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer