PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWX vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWX vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -3.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RWX has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 0.30%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


RWX

1D
0.09%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-3.25%
6M
-1.75%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
0.30%

SPYM

1D
0.34%
1M
4.60%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.25%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWX vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
-3.25%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-21.84%9.34%-9.03%19.88%-8.25%15.50%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.36%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RWX and SPYM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.60

The correlation between RWX and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWX vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWX
SPYM

Real Estate

60.5%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
9.9%

Financial Services

2.8%
11.1%

Technology

2.7%
38.5%

Healthcare

1.5%
8.4%

Energy

1.2%
3.2%

Industrials

0.6%
7.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Real Estate

RWX
60.5%
SPYM
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RWX
3.1%
SPYM
9.9%

Financial Services

RWX
2.8%
SPYM
11.1%

Technology

RWX
2.7%
SPYM
38.5%

Healthcare

RWX
1.5%
SPYM
8.4%

Energy

RWX
1.2%
SPYM
3.2%

Industrials

RWX
0.6%
SPYM
7.6%

Basic Materials

RWX

-

SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

RWX

-

SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

RWX

-

SPYM
4.6%

Utilities

RWX

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWX vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWX vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWXSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.44

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

3.23

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

15.02

-14.17

RWX vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWX and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWXSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

2.44

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.84

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.87

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.62

-0.59

Drawdowns

RWX vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWXSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.62%

-54.46%

-19.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.58%

-8.90%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-18.72%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.91%

-24.48%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.37%

-33.87%

-9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.68%

-0.32%

-14.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.29%

-7.15%

-13.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

1.91%

+2.68%

Volatility

RWX vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.78%. This indicates that RWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWXSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

2.78%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

8.91%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

11.79%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

16.80%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

18.00%

-1.51%

RWX vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWX vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than SPYM's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
3.78%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
0.99%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWX and SPYM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to SPYM (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWX dropped -73.62% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.57% vs 0.30% for RWX. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

RWX has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.99% for SPYM.

RWX is categorized as REIT, while SPYM is S&P 500. RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RWX and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWX and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer