RWX vs. RWO
RWX (SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF) and RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds from State Street - RWX tracks the Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index while RWO tracks the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWX returned 0.83%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for RWO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RWO.
Performance
RWX vs. RWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than RWO's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RWX has underperformed RWO with an annualized return of 0.83%, while RWO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.78% annualized return.
RWX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -3.04%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- -2.62%
- 10Y*
- 0.83%
RWO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
RWX vs. RWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF | -3.84% | 26.24% | -12.15% | 6.25% | -21.84% | 9.34% | -9.03% | 19.88% | -8.25% | 15.50% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 10.38% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWX and RWO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008 | 0.80 |
The correlation between RWX and RWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWX vs. RWO — Risk / Return Rank
RWX
RWO
RWX vs. RWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWX | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.59 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 6.11 | -5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWX vs. RWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than RWO's maximum drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and RWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWX | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -67.69% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.58% | -9.51% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -17.66% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.91% | -32.85% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.37% | -43.27% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.20% | -1.73% | -13.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.28% | -12.65% | -7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 2.47% | +2.64% |
Volatility
RWX vs. RWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) is 4.01%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that RWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWX | RWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 4.50% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 9.86% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 13.14% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 17.06% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 18.24% | -1.76% |
RWX vs. RWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RWO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWX vs. RWO - Dividend Comparison
RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than RWO's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.27% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF | 4.07% | 3.65% | 4.32% | 3.90% | 4.05% | 4.62% | 2.92% | 8.94% | 5.28% | 2.77% | 8.74% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWX and RWO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWO has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to RWX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWX dropped -73.62% vs RWO's -67.69%.
On 10-year performance, RWO leads with 3.78% vs 0.83% for RWX. On fees, RWO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RWO has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 0.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.
RWX has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 4.20% for RWO.
RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index, while RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RWX and 0.50% for RWO.
RWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWX and RWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer