RWX vs. IFGL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RWX (SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF) and IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - RWX tracks the Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index while IFGL tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWX returned 0.46%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for IFGL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IFGL.

Performance

RWX vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than IFGL's -1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RWX has underperformed IFGL with an annualized return of 0.46%, while IFGL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.53% annualized return.

RWX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -2.35%
• 6M: -0.94%
• 1Y: 3.97%
• 3Y*: 5.38%
• 5Y*: -2.27%
• 10Y*: 0.46%

IFGL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -4.23%
• YTD: -1.03%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 7.01%
• 5Y*: -2.27%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWX vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF	-2.35%	26.24%	-12.15%	6.25%	-21.84%	9.34%	-9.03%	19.88%	-8.25%	15.50%
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF	-1.03%	24.31%	-7.25%	5.40%	-24.21%	8.29%	-7.62%	20.65%	-6.39%	20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RWX and IFGL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007	0.91

The correlation between RWX and IFGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWX vs. IFGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWX	IFGL
Real Estate	60.5%	98.9%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	0.1%
Financial Services	2.8%	-
Technology	2.7%	1.1%
Healthcare	1.5%	-
Energy	1.2%	-
Industrials	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RWX vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWX

RWX Risk / Return Rank: 13
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IFGL

IFGL Risk / Return Rank: 16
IFGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
IFGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
IFGL Omega Ratio Rank: 16
IFGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
IFGL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWX vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWX	IFGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.49	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	0.79	-0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.10	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	0.53	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	1.65	-0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWX vs. IFGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the IFGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWX and IFGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWX	IFGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.49	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	-0.14	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.09	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.04	-0.01

Drawdowns

RWX vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than IFGL's maximum drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and IFGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWX	IFGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.62%	-67.94%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.58%	-14.38%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.05%	-18.77%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.91%	-38.47%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.37%	-40.38%	-2.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.89%	-13.93%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.30%	-16.68%	-3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	4.59%	-0.11%

Volatility

RWX vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) is 4.13%, while iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that RWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWX	IFGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	4.58%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	11.42%	-0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	13.66%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.84%	16.38%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	16.59%	-0.10%

RWX vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWX vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison

RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than IFGL's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF	3.85%	3.71%	4.83%	1.82%	2.79%	3.25%	2.17%	7.60%	4.10%	4.90%	7.68%	3.70%
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF	3.74%	3.65%	4.32%	3.90%	4.05%	4.62%	2.92%	8.94%	5.28%	2.77%	8.74%	2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWX and IFGL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, RWX and IFGL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RWX or IFGL?

IFGL has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to RWX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWX dropped -73.62% vs IFGL's -67.94%.

Which ETF is better, RWX or IFGL?

On 10-year performance, IFGL leads with 1.53% vs 0.46% for RWX. On fees, IFGL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWX or IFGL?

Over the 10-year period, IFGL has performed better with a 1.53% return vs 0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWX or IFGL?

IFGL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWX or IFGL?

IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.74% for RWX.

What is the main difference between RWX and IFGL?

RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index, while IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RWX and 0.48% for IFGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IFGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.