RWX vs. NETL
RWX (SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - RWX tracks the Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index while NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWX returned -2.65%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for NETL. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
RWX vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWX achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 10.34% return.
RWX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -3.34%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 0.36%
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
RWX vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF | -3.34% | 26.24% | -12.15% | 6.25% | -21.84% | 9.34% | -9.03% | 8.51% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWX and NETL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between RWX and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWX vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWX
NETL
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
RWX
NETL
Consumer Cyclical
RWX
NETL
-
Financial Services
RWX
NETL
-
Technology
RWX
NETL
-
Healthcare
RWX
NETL
-
Energy
RWX
NETL
-
Industrials
RWX
NETL
-
Basic Materials
RWX
-
NETL
-
Communication Services
RWX
-
NETL
-
Consumer Defensive
RWX
-
NETL
-
Utilities
RWX
-
NETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWX vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
RWX
NETL
RWX vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWX | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.15 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 1.27 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 3.99 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWX | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 0.86 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.07 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.20 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
RWX vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWX and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWX | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -51.48% | -22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.58% | -9.16% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -19.30% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.91% | -30.74% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | -3.68% | -11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -11.65% | -8.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 2.91% | +1.63% |
Volatility
RWX vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that RWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWX | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.66% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 9.66% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 13.57% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 17.94% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 25.92% | -9.43% |
RWX vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWX vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
RWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than NETL's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWX SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF | 3.78% | 3.65% | 4.32% | 3.90% | 4.05% | 4.62% | 2.92% | 8.94% | 5.28% | 2.77% | 8.74% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWX and NETL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWX dropped -73.62% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.33% vs -2.65% for RWX. On fees, RWX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.33% return vs -2.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.78% for RWX.
RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RWX and 0.60% for NETL.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWX and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer