RWT vs. VZ
RWT (Redwood Trust, Inc.) and VZ (Verizon Communications Inc.) are both stocks. RWT operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while VZ operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, RWT returned -2.19%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for VZ. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RWT vs. VZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWT achieves a -11.35% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 20.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RWT has underperformed VZ with an annualized return of -2.19%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively higher 4.03% annualized return.
RWT
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -11.35%
- 1Y
- -4.38%
- 3Y*
- -5.25%
- 5Y*
- -7.74%
- 10Y*
- -2.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.88%
VZ
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.26M | $20.65M | $12.03M | |
| $1.31B | $1.33B | $1.24B |
RWT vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc. | -11.35% | -4.08% | -2.60% | 21.61% | -42.26% | 60.13% | -42.70% | 18.16% | 9.40% | 4.49% |
VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 20.70% | 8.86% | 13.14% | 2.71% | -20.02% | -7.55% | -0.13% | 13.83% | 11.26% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWT and VZ is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2000 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RWT and VZ has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RWT:
$572.24M
VZ:
$195.46B
RWT:
$0.10
VZ:
$3.84
RWT:
46.65
VZ:
12.19
RWT:
0.47
VZ:
1.42
RWT:
$921.20M
VZ:
$138.90B
RWT:
$292.96M
VZ:
$82.07B
RWT:
$326.59M
VZ:
$47.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWT vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank
RWT
VZ
RWT vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWT | VZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.15 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 1.00 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 2.26 | -2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWT vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWT drawdown since its inception was -88.91%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWT and VZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWT | VZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.91% | -50.66% | -38.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.06% | -17.05% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.79% | -17.05% | -16.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.83% | -38.38% | -17.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.40% | -41.21% | -44.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.70% | -5.95% | -56.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.65% | -14.81% | -30.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.86% | 7.52% | +5.34% |
Volatility
RWT vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison
Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 8.14%. This indicates that RWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWT | VZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.42% | 8.14% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.52% | 20.99% | +9.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.08% | 24.84% | +12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.36% | 22.28% | +13.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.21% | 20.65% | +28.56% |
Dividends
RWT vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison
RWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.75%, more than VZ's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWT Redwood Trust, Inc. | 15.75% | 13.02% | 10.26% | 9.58% | 13.61% | 5.91% | 8.26% | 7.26% | 7.83% | 7.56% | 7.36% | 8.48% |
VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 5.97% | 6.68% | 6.68% | 6.96% | 6.53% | 4.85% | 4.21% | 3.95% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 4.26% | 4.79% |
Financials
RWT vs. VZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Redwood Trust, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RWT vs. VZ - Profitability Comparison
RWT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.16B and revenue of 34.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.
RWT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 12.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
VZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 34.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
RWT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Redwood Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50M and revenue of 12.20M, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.
VZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a net income of 3.84B and revenue of 34.25B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RWT and VZ have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWT has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to VZ (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWT dropped -88.91% vs VZ's -50.66%.
VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWT and VZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer