PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 5.39%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return.


RWR

1D
1.38%
1M
0.75%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.45%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
5.39%

SPYG

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.54%
YTD
13.73%
6M
13.08%
1Y
33.66%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
12.61%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.73%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and SPYG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2001

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between RWR and SPYG has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RWR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWR
SPYG

Real Estate

98.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
8.5%

Utilities

0.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

5.0%

Technology

-

51.9%

Real Estate

RWR
98.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Financial Services

RWR
0.0%
SPYG
8.5%

Utilities

RWR
0.0%
SPYG
1.2%

Basic Materials

RWR

-

SPYG
0.3%

Communication Services

RWR

-

SPYG
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RWR

-

SPYG
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

RWR

-

SPYG
1.0%

Energy

RWR

-

SPYG
0.1%

Healthcare

RWR

-

SPYG
5.8%

Industrials

RWR

-

SPYG
5.0%

Technology

RWR

-

SPYG
51.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWRSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.46

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

10.17

-2.99

RWR vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWRSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.11

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.76

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.88

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Drawdowns

RWR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-67.63%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-13.76%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-22.14%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-32.67%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-32.67%

-11.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-1.15%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-24.32%

+11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.32%

-0.95%

Volatility

RWR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.34%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

12.46%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

16.06%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

21.16%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

20.64%

+0.87%

RWR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.39%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to RWR (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.16% vs 5.39% for RWR. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.16% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

RWR is categorized as REIT, while SPYG is S&P 500. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer