PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWO vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWO vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 3.42%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


RWO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
7.94%
6M
7.05%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
3.42%

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
7.94%8.87%1.76%10.91%-25.11%31.03%-10.44%21.17%-6.04%7.80%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and SPYD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015

0.74

The correlation between RWO and SPYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWO vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWO
SPYD

Real Estate

89.3%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
6.5%

Financial Services

0.8%
12.1%

Technology

0.7%
2.7%

Healthcare

0.4%
5.2%

Energy

0.3%
9.2%

Industrials

0.2%
2.3%

Utilities

0.0%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Communication Services

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

16.3%

Real Estate

RWO
89.3%
SPYD
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RWO
0.8%
SPYD
6.5%

Financial Services

RWO
0.8%
SPYD
12.1%

Technology

RWO
0.7%
SPYD
2.7%

Healthcare

RWO
0.4%
SPYD
5.2%

Energy

RWO
0.3%
SPYD
9.2%

Industrials

RWO
0.2%
SPYD
2.3%

Utilities

RWO
0.0%
SPYD
11.4%

Basic Materials

RWO

-

SPYD
3.4%

Communication Services

RWO

-

SPYD
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

RWO

-

SPYD
16.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWO vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO
RWO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWOSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.33

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

6.77

-1.50

RWO vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWOSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.42

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.42

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.44

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.47

-0.31

Drawdowns

RWO vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWOSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-46.42%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-7.05%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-16.13%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-22.25%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.27%

-46.42%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-1.11%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-6.17%

-6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.43%

+0.02%

Volatility

RWO vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.57%. This indicates that RWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWOSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.57%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

7.71%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

11.62%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.13%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

19.78%

-1.57%

RWO vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWO vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.35%3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWO and SPYD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWO has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 3.42% for RWO. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 3.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.35% for RWO.

RWO is categorized as REIT, while SPYD is S&P 500. RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWO and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer