RWO vs. PLD
RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while PLD (Prologis, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RWO returned 3.42%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for PLD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RWO vs. PLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 3.42%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.
RWO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 3.42%
PLD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
RWO vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 7.94% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 11.99% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWO and PLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2008 | 0.77 |
The correlation between RWO and PLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWO vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank
RWO
PLD
RWO vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWO | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.29 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 3.63 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 11.97 | -6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWO | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.22 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.54 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.33 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
RWO vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and PLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWO | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -84.70% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -9.59% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -31.37% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -43.30% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | -43.30% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -7.29% | +4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -17.37% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 2.90% | -0.45% |
Volatility
RWO vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 3.93%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWO | PLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 5.62% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 14.08% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 21.13% | -8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 26.94% | -9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 26.98% | -8.77% |
Dividends
RWO vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison
RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than PLD's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.89% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.35% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWO and PLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLD has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to RWO (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs PLD's -84.70%.
PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWO and PLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer