PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWO vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWO vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than PLD's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 3.42%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.


RWO

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
7.94%
6M
7.05%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
3.42%

PLD

1D
1.00%
1M
2.21%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.52%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
14.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
7.94%8.87%1.76%10.91%-25.11%31.03%-10.44%21.17%-6.04%7.80%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
11.99%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and PLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2008

0.77

The correlation between RWO and PLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWO vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO
RWO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWOPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.63

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

11.97

-6.71

RWO vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWO and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWOPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.65

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.22

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.54

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.33

-0.17

Drawdowns

RWO vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and PLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWOPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-84.70%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-9.59%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-31.37%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

-43.30%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.27%

-43.30%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-7.29%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-17.37%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.90%

-0.45%

Volatility

RWO vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 3.93%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWOPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

5.62%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

14.08%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

21.13%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

26.94%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

26.98%

-8.77%

Dividends

RWO vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than PLD's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.89%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%
RWO
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF
3.35%3.62%3.68%3.53%3.69%2.79%3.25%3.97%3.90%3.26%3.77%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWO and PLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLD has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to RWO (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs PLD's -84.70%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWO and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer