RWO vs. PDBC
RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWO is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. RWO is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWO returned 3.45%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
RWO vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 3.45%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.69% annualized return.
RWO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 18.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.45%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
RWO vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 13.24% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.08% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWO and PDBC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between RWO and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWO vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
RWO
PDBC
RWO vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWO | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.75 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 6.25 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWO vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWO | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -49.52% | -18.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -16.55% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -16.55% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -27.63% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | -40.73% | -2.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -13.06% | +12.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -23.11% | +10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 4.64% | -2.18% |
Volatility
RWO vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 4.49%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWO | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 5.48% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 16.59% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 18.72% | -5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 19.19% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 17.75% | +0.44% |
RWO vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWO vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than PDBC's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.09% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.19% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWO and PDBC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to RWO (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 10-year performance, PDBC leads with 7.69% vs 3.45% for RWO. On fees, RWO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RWO has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
RWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 3.09% for PDBC.
RWO is categorized as REIT, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWO and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer