RWO vs. IVRA

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWO is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco. RWO is passively managed, while IVRA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IVRA.

Performance

RWO vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RWO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.12%
• 6M: 10.57%
• YTD: 13.78%
• 1Y: 19.44%
• 3Y*: 9.66%
• 5Y*: 2.54%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

IVRA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWO vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	13.78%	8.87%	1.76%	10.91%	-25.11%	31.03%	3.13%
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	11.70%	10.20%	13.07%	9.13%	-10.00%	32.74%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RWO and IVRA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between RWO and IVRA has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RWO vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWO

RWO Risk / Return Rank: 52
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

IVRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWO vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWO	IVRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RWO	IVRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.60%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RWO	IVRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.21%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.19%	—	—

RWO vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWO vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison

RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	16.80%	5.68%	3.71%	2.47%	2.30%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	3.18%	3.62%	3.68%	3.53%	3.69%	2.79%	3.25%	3.97%	3.90%	3.26%	3.77%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWO and IVRA in my portfolio?

RWO and IVRA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RWO or IVRA?

On fees, RWO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWO or IVRA?

RWO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWO or IVRA?

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 3.18% for RWO.

What is the main difference between RWO and IVRA?

RWO is categorized as REIT, while IVRA is ESG. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.59% for IVRA.