RWO vs. EEMV
RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWO is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while EEMV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWO returned 3.52%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for EEMV. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.
Performance
RWO vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 3.52%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively higher 5.61% annualized return.
RWO
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 20.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.10%
EEMV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 15.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.18%
RWO vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 15.38% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 11.64% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWO and EEMV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RWO and EEMV has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWO vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
RWO
EEMV
RWO vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWO | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.67 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.31 | 5.34 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWO vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and EEMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWO | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -31.56% | -36.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -9.22% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -12.47% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -21.90% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | -31.56% | -11.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -7.88% | +7.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -7.94% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.89% | -0.43% |
Volatility
RWO vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 4.00%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWO | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 6.62% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 14.93% | -4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 15.97% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 12.51% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 14.00% | +4.21% |
RWO vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWO vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than EEMV's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.29% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 3.13% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWO and EEMV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to RWO (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs EEMV's -31.56%.
On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 5.61% vs 3.52% for RWO. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RWO has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 5.61% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.
RWO has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.29% for EEMV.
RWO is categorized as REIT, while EEMV is Emerging Markets Equities. RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.25% for EEMV.
RWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWO and EEMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer