EEMV vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
EEMV and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both EEMV and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EEMV or MCHI.
Key characteristics
| EEMV | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.17% | 22.40% |
| 1Y Return | 16.75% | 17.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.85% | -7.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.91% | -2.38% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.71% | 2.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 0.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.54 | 1.05 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.40 | 1.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.59% | 10.29% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.39% | 30.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.56% | -62.84% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.31% | -45.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and MCHI is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EEMV vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 2.71%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMV vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EEMV vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EEMV vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than MCHI's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.79% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% | 2.71% | 2.51% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.39% | 3.49% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and MCHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EEMV vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is 2.46%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that EEMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.