PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWMGX vs. RMFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWMGX achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly lower than RMFGX's 6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, RWMGX has outperformed RMFGX with an annualized return of 13.22%, while RMFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.51% annualized return.


RWMGX

1D
0.39%
1M
2.82%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.16%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
13.22%

RMFGX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.98%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.03%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
6.01%17.56%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.84%8.02%25.78%-5.91%20.38%
RMFGX
American Mutual Fund Class R-6
6.79%16.43%15.28%9.78%-4.19%25.28%5.15%21.92%-2.00%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RWMGX and RMFGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.97

The correlation between RWMGX and RMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWMGX vs. RMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWMGX
RWMGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RWMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RMFGX
RMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMGXRMFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.31

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

9.29

+0.39

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the RMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWMGX and RMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMGXRMFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.92

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.86

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.82

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.83

-0.01

Drawdowns

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWMGX drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than RMFGX's maximum drawdown of -29.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWMGX and RMFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMGXRMFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-29.79%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-7.89%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.61%

-12.90%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-15.17%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-29.79%

-4.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-2.72%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.96%

-0.04%

Volatility

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) have volatilities of 2.42% and 2.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMGXRMFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.34%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

7.34%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

9.50%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

12.51%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

14.12%

+2.21%

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RWMGX and RMFGX have an expense ratio of 0.27%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWMGX vs. RMFGX - Dividend Comparison

RWMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, more than RMFGX's 7.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMFGX
American Mutual Fund Class R-6
7.39%7.85%6.59%4.06%5.20%4.88%2.30%4.89%6.75%6.23%4.54%6.84%
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.82%10.36%10.36%6.42%6.63%6.33%3.35%6.91%4.67%7.52%6.66%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RWMGX and RMFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RWMGX has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to RMFGX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWMGX dropped -34.64% vs RMFGX's -29.79%.

RMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWMGX and RMFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer