PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWMGX vs. VITSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWMGX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than VITSX's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RWMGX has underperformed VITSX with an annualized return of 13.21%, while VITSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.65% annualized return.


RWMGX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.77%
6M
8.33%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
12.96%

VITSX

1D
1.52%
1M
1.31%
6M
10.66%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
14.65%
ALL TIME*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.99%17.56%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.84%8.02%25.78%-5.91%20.38%
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
12.18%17.14%23.25%26.51%-19.51%25.74%20.99%30.80%-5.18%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RWMGX and VITSX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.95

The correlation between RWMGX and VITSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWMGX vs. VITSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWMGX
RWMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RWMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VITSX
VITSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VITSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VITSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWMGXVITSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.66

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

11.52

-1.81

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the VITSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWMGX and VITSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWMGX drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum VITSX drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWMGX and VITSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMGXVITSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-55.30%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-8.92%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.61%

-19.36%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-25.36%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-34.97%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-10.02%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.06%

-0.14%

Volatility

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) is 2.39%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that RWMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMGXVITSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

3.77%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

10.37%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

13.12%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

17.48%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

18.42%

-2.13%

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWMGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VITSX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWMGX vs. VITSX - Dividend Comparison

RWMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, more than VITSX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.70%10.36%10.36%6.42%6.63%6.33%3.35%6.91%4.67%7.52%6.66%6.55%
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.43%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.77%2.04%1.71%1.93%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWMGX and VITSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITSX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to RWMGX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWMGX dropped -34.64% vs VITSX's -55.30%.

VITSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWMGX and VITSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer