RWK vs. VTI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWK returned 13.00%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RWK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

RWK vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RWK has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 13.00%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.

RWK

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 13.42%
• YTD: 18.15%
• 1Y: 28.53%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 13.00%
• ALL TIME*: 11.54%

VTI

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 8.77%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 1Y: 21.84%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 14.63%
• ALL TIME*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	$2.23M	$2.59M	$2.47M
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	$1.06B	$1.16B	$1.24B

RWK vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	18.15%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-14.65%	13.39%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	10.49%	17.10%	23.81%	26.05%	-19.52%	25.68%	21.08%	30.67%	-5.23%	21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and VTI is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008	0.84

The correlation between RWK and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWK vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWK	VTI
Industrials	23.3%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	21.0%	9.4%
Financial Services	13.0%	11.8%
Technology	11.8%	36.1%
Consumer Defensive	11.1%	4.3%
Energy	4.9%	3.2%
Healthcare	4.7%	9.7%
Basic Materials	4.4%	1.9%
Real Estate	2.9%	2.3%
Utilities	1.6%	2.2%
Communication Services	1.4%	9.1%

Return for Risk

RWK vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 69
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 67
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWK vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWK	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.52	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.12	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.23	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	9.62	-1.84

RWK vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWK vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWK	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-55.45%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-8.92%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.58%	-19.30%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.58%	-25.36%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.20%	-35.00%	-11.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-1.36%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-7.99%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	2.07%	+1.28%

Volatility

RWK vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWK	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	3.46%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	10.24%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	13.10%	+3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	17.51%	+3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	18.30%	+4.58%

RWK vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWK vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VTI's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.00%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.06%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWK and VTI in my portfolio?

RWK and VTI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWK or VTI?

RWK has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, RWK or VTI?

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.63% vs 13.00% for RWK. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWK or VTI?

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWK or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWK or VTI?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 1.00% for RWK.

What is the main difference between RWK and VTI?

RWK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWK and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.