RWK vs. VB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RWK tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index while VB tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWK returned 13.00%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RWK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VB.

Performance

RWK vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RWK has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 13.00%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.

RWK

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 13.42%
• YTD: 18.15%
• 1Y: 28.53%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 13.00%
• ALL TIME*: 11.54%

VB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.73%
• 6M: 10.09%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 11.08%
• ALL TIME*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	$2.23M	$2.59M	$2.47M
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	$121.48M	$119.40M	$165.11M

RWK vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	18.15%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-14.65%	13.39%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.19%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and VB is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008	0.92

The correlation between RWK and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWK vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWK	VB
Industrials	23.3%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	21.0%	11.6%
Financial Services	13.0%	12.4%
Technology	11.8%	17.9%
Consumer Defensive	11.1%	3.3%
Energy	4.9%	3.9%
Healthcare	4.7%	12.5%
Basic Materials	4.4%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.9%	7.9%
Utilities	1.6%	3.3%
Communication Services	1.4%	2.9%

Return for Risk

RWK vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 69
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 69
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWK vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWK	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.46	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.13	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.67	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	9.73	-1.95

RWK vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWK vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWK	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-59.56%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.14%	-8.98%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.58%	-25.36%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.58%	-28.15%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.20%	-42.05%	-4.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-2.63%	+1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-8.39%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	2.46%	+0.89%

Volatility

RWK vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.36%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWK	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	3.36%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	12.01%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	16.47%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	20.69%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	21.37%	+1.51%

RWK vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWK vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VB's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.00%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.22%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWK and VB in my portfolio?

RWK and VB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWK or VB?

RWK has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which ETF is better, RWK or VB?

On 10-year performance, RWK leads with 13.00% vs 11.08% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWK or VB?

Over the 10-year period, RWK has performed better with a 13.00% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWK or VB?

VB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWK or VB?

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 1.00% for RWK.

What is the main difference between RWK and VB?

RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWK and 0.03% for VB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.