PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWK vs. HFXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWK vs. HFXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than HFXI's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RWK has outperformed HFXI with an annualized return of 12.69%, while HFXI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


RWK

1D
-0.93%
1M
1.82%
6M
10.32%
YTD
16.44%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
12.69%
ALL TIME*
11.47%

HFXI

1D
-0.49%
1M
-5.10%
6M
8.59%
YTD
13.95%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
11.03%
ALL TIME*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWK vs. HFXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
16.44%10.27%11.94%23.76%-8.19%34.31%11.06%28.20%-14.65%13.39%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
13.95%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and HFXI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.69

The correlation between RWK and HFXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWK vs. HFXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWK
HFXI

Industrials

23.3%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

21.0%
7.9%

Financial Services

13.0%
21.9%

Technology

11.8%
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
6.0%

Energy

4.9%
3.2%

Healthcare

4.7%
9.0%

Basic Materials

4.4%
6.0%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.3%

Utilities

1.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

1.4%
3.5%

Industrials

RWK
23.3%
HFXI
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RWK
21.0%
HFXI
7.9%

Financial Services

RWK
13.0%
HFXI
21.9%

Technology

RWK
11.8%
HFXI
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

RWK
11.1%
HFXI
6.0%

Energy

RWK
4.9%
HFXI
3.2%

Healthcare

RWK
4.7%
HFXI
9.0%

Basic Materials

RWK
4.4%
HFXI
6.0%

Real Estate

RWK
2.9%
HFXI
2.3%

Utilities

RWK
1.6%
HFXI
3.2%

Communication Services

RWK
1.4%
HFXI
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWK vs. HFXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWK
RWK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWK vs. HFXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWKHFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.72

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

10.22

-3.68

RWK vs. HFXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the HFXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and HFXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWK vs. HFXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than HFXI's maximum drawdown of -32.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and HFXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWKHFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-32.42%

-24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-10.84%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.58%

-13.52%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-22.35%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.20%

-32.42%

-13.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-5.17%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-5.42%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.88%

+0.57%

Volatility

RWK vs. HFXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is 3.12%, while IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that RWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWKHFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

5.93%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

14.58%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

16.37%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

15.16%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

16.57%

+6.31%

RWK vs. HFXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HFXI's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWK vs. HFXI - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than HFXI's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.40%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
1.02%1.25%1.11%1.05%1.18%0.85%0.96%1.09%1.22%0.99%1.30%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWK and HFXI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFXI has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to RWK (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs HFXI's -32.42%.

On 10-year performance, RWK leads with 12.69% vs 11.03% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RWK has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RWK has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.02% for RWK.

RWK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HFXI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index, while HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWK and 0.20% for HFXI.

HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWK and HFXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer