RWJ vs. SAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA).
RWJ and SAA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. SAA is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. Both RWJ and SAA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RWJ vs. SAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWJ vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 4.08% | 7.75% | 11.81% | 16.21% | -10.97% | 52.82% | 20.83% | 20.29% | -16.95% | 5.30% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 4.69% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than SAA's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RWJ has outperformed SAA with an annualized return of 12.14%, while SAA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
RWJ
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
SAA
- 1D
- 5.46%
- 1M
- -10.15%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 29.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- -1.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWJ vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SAA's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWJ vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank
RWJ
SAA
RWJ vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWJ | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.64 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.19 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.09 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 3.99 | +1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWJ | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.64 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.04 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.22 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.16 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and SAA is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RWJ vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than SAA's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 1.13% | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.11% | 0.60% | 0.74% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.96% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, smaller than the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and SAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWJ | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.97% | -87.39% | +31.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.11% | -28.46% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -55.37% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -74.54% | +23.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -21.91% | +14.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -27.60% | +18.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 7.77% | -3.25% |
Volatility
RWJ vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is 6.11%, while ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a volatility of 12.66%. This indicates that RWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWJ | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 12.66% | -6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 26.90% | -12.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.39% | 46.27% | -20.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 43.74% | -19.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 46.10% | -19.94% |