SAA vs. ^SML
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while ^SML (S&P Small-Cap 600 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, SAA returned 11.62%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for ^SML. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
SAA vs. ^SML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than ^SML's 15.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has outperformed ^SML with an annualized return of 11.62%, while ^SML has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.
SAA
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 30.42%
- 6M
- 31.77%
- 1Y
- 66.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
^SML
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
SAA vs. ^SML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 30.42% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
^SML S&P Small-Cap 600 Index | 15.58% | 4.23% | 6.82% | 13.89% | -17.42% | 25.27% | 9.57% | 20.86% | -9.75% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and ^SML is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SAA and ^SML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. ^SML — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
^SML
SAA vs. ^SML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and S&P Small-Cap 600 Index (^SML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAA | ^SML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.87 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 2.71 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.59 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 12.00 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAA | ^SML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.87 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.20 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.39 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.42 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SAA vs. ^SML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than ^SML's maximum drawdown of -59.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and ^SML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | ^SML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -59.17% | -28.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -8.94% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | -28.39% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -28.39% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | -45.77% | -28.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -0.07% | -2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.43% | -9.51% | -17.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 2.67% | +2.96% |
Volatility
SAA vs. ^SML - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to S&P Small-Cap 600 Index (^SML) at 4.49%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | ^SML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 4.49% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.86% | 11.71% | +12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.90% | 17.56% | +18.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 21.45% | +22.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.13% | 23.20% | +22.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SAA and ^SML move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SAA has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to ^SML (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs ^SML's -59.17%.
^SML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAA and ^SML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer