RWJ vs. ECML

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML).

RWJ and ECML are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. ECML is an actively managed fund by Euclidean. It was launched on May 17, 2023.

Performance

RWJ vs. ECML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RWJ vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	3.96%	7.75%	11.81%	14.67%
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	8.76%	6.82%	2.37%	24.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than ECML's 8.76% return.

RWJ

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 25.54%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 6.87%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

ECML

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWJ vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.

ECML

EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

RWJ

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF

Return for Risk

RWJ vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWJ

RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 62
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ECML

ECML Risk / Return Rank: 60
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWJ vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWJ	ECML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.05	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.62	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.61	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.69	6.01	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWJ vs. ECML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the ECML Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWJ and ECML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWJ	ECML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.05	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.79	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between RWJ and ECML is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RWJ vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison

RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than ECML's 1.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	1.13%	1.11%	1.15%	1.34%	1.02%	0.61%	0.89%	1.22%	1.44%	1.11%	0.60%	0.74%
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	1.26%	1.38%	0.98%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RWJ vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than ECML's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and ECML.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWJ	ECML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.97%	-24.66%	-31.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.11%	-12.96%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.49%	-2.69%	-4.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-6.19%	-3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	3.48%	+1.02%

Volatility

RWJ vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 4.48%. This indicates that RWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWJ	ECML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	4.48%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	10.17%	+3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	19.29%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.88%	18.69%	+5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.16%	18.69%	+7.47%