PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWIGX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIGX achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 21.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RWIGX has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.


RWIGX

1D
0.65%
1M
6.72%
YTD
16.57%
6M
18.15%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
12.56%

VGPMX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.96%
YTD
21.14%
6M
25.95%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
16.57%25.09%14.21%20.87%-17.02%15.11%15.71%25.94%-10.32%24.95%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
21.14%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIGX and VGPMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.64

The correlation between RWIGX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWIGX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWIGX
RWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWIGXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.69

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

5.25

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

21.90

-7.23

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIGX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWIGXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

4.02

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.19

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.55

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.26

+0.38

Drawdowns

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIGX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIGX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWIGXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-78.85%

+46.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-12.80%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-14.63%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-22.71%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-54.59%

+22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-34.55%

+29.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.06%

-0.68%

Volatility

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6 (RWIGX) is 4.40%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that RWIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWIGXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.98%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

13.83%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

16.76%

-3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

17.38%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

20.87%

-4.82%

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWIGX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

RWIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than VGPMX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWIGX
Capital World Growth and Income Fund Class R-6
9.36%10.86%8.23%3.44%2.45%7.16%1.53%2.90%7.37%6.94%5.60%4.04%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.22%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWIGX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to RWIGX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIGX dropped -31.98% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWIGX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer