RVP vs. VONV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RVP (Retractable Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. Over the past 10 years, RVP returned -12.35%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for VONV. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RVP vs. VONV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVP achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than VONV's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RVP has underperformed VONV with an annualized return of -12.35%, while VONV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.

RVP

• 1D: 4.82%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: -6.75%
• 6M: -12.22%
• 1Y: 8.60%
• 3Y*: -14.94%
• 5Y*: -42.38%
• 10Y*: -12.35%

VONV

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 15.48%
• 6M: 14.29%
• 1Y: 27.38%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVP vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RVP Retractable Technologies, Inc.	-6.75%	12.16%	-37.98%	-32.32%	-76.33%	-35.47%	616.00%	152.10%	-12.50%	-26.88%
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF	15.48%	15.81%	14.28%	11.40%	-7.65%	25.28%	2.71%	26.48%	-8.45%	13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RVP and VONV is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.13

The correlation between RVP and VONV shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RVP vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVP

RVP Risk / Return Rank: 48
RVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
RVP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
RVP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

VONV

VONV Risk / Return Rank: 85
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVP vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RVP	VONV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	2.44	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	3.43	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.44	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	4.04	-3.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	16.77	-16.43

RVP vs. VONV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the VONV Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVP and VONV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RVP vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVP drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than VONV's maximum drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVP and VONV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVP	VONV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.34%	-38.21%	-59.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.42%	-6.81%	-34.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.39%	-15.70%	-41.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.75%	-18.87%	-76.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.34%	-38.21%	-59.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.65%	-1.09%	-95.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.84%	-3.89%	-74.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.95%	1.64%	+24.31%

Volatility

RVP vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison

Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) at 4.09%. This indicates that RVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVP	VONV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.28%	4.09%	+9.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.70%	8.69%	+26.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.04%	11.27%	+35.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.96%	14.81%	+36.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.64%	17.23%	+57.41%

Dividends

RVP vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison

RVP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RVP Retractable Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF	1.63%	1.82%	1.97%	2.10%	2.22%	1.67%	2.25%	2.30%	2.56%	2.18%	2.39%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVP and VONV in my portfolio?

RVP and VONV have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVP or VONV?

RVP has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to VONV (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVP dropped -97.34% vs VONV's -38.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.