PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVP vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RVP vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RVP vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RVP
Retractable Technologies, Inc.
-14.32%12.16%-37.98%-32.32%-76.33%-41.32%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
6.69%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVP achieves a -14.32% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 6.69% return.


RVP

1D
-4.05%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-14.32%
6M
-21.44%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-27.70%
5Y*
-44.41%
10Y*
-11.32%

AVLV

1D
2.27%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
6.69%
6M
12.29%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RVP vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVP
RVP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVP vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVPAVLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

1.36

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.13

1.94

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.30

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

1.91

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.28

9.18

-9.46

RVP vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVP Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVP and AVLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVPAVLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

1.36

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.71

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between RVP and AVLV is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RVP vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

RVP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.


TTM20252024202320222021
RVP
Retractable Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.21%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%

Drawdowns

RVP vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVP drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVP and AVLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RVPAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.34%

-19.50%

-77.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.68%

-13.79%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.92%

-4.26%

-92.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.68%

-4.06%

-74.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.12%

2.86%

+17.26%

Volatility

RVP vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RVP) has a higher volatility of 15.54% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 4.85%. This indicates that RVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RVPAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.54%

4.85%

+10.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.31%

9.85%

+25.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.31%

18.67%

+26.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.79%

17.55%

+34.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.64%

17.55%

+57.09%