RVNU vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RVNU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while DBAW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RVNU returned 1.90%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for DBAW. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

RVNU vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RVNU has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 1.90%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.

RVNU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

DBAW

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 18.39%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 11.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNU vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.71%	0.58%	1.46%	11.19%	-16.60%	2.28%	6.54%	10.16%	-0.56%	8.24%
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	16.12%	26.47%	14.35%	16.26%	-13.35%	13.08%	7.44%	22.96%	-10.38%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNU and DBAW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2014	-0.00

The correlation between RVNU and DBAW shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RVNU vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 63
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 65

DBAW

DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNU vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVNU	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.86	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	3.90	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.55	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	4.09	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.69	16.97	-5.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RVNU vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNU and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVNU	DBAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.86	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.83	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.75	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.63	-0.24

Drawdowns

RVNU vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and DBAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVNU	DBAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.51%	-31.44%	+7.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-9.00%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.35%	-14.11%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.51%	-17.87%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.51%	-31.44%	+7.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-0.51%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-5.00%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	2.16%	-1.33%

Volatility

RVNU vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) is 1.42%, while Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that RVNU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVNU	DBAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	4.71%	-3.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.41%	11.00%	-7.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	12.88%	-7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.19%	13.74%	-6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	15.28%	-8.01%

RVNU vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

RVNU vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than DBAW's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF	3.29%	3.83%	1.70%	3.45%	8.81%	2.05%	2.08%	2.91%	2.93%	2.41%	1.99%	5.74%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.52%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVNU and DBAW in my portfolio?

RVNU and DBAW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVNU or DBAW?

DBAW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to RVNU (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNU dropped -23.51% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

Which ETF is better, RVNU or DBAW?

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.44% vs 1.90% for RVNU. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RVNU has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVNU or DBAW?

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVNU or DBAW?

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVNU or DBAW?

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.29% for DBAW.

What is the main difference between RVNU and DBAW?

RVNU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBAW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.41% for DBAW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.