RVNU vs. CN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RVNU is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while CN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

RVNU vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RVNU

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 9.36%
• 3Y*: 3.44%
• 5Y*: -0.19%
• 10Y*: 1.93%

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNU vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.90%	0.58%	1.46%	11.19%	-16.60%	2.28%	6.54%	10.16%	-0.56%	8.24%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNU and CN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014	-0.02

The correlation between RVNU and CN shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RVNU vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 62
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNU vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RVNU	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVNU	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RVNU	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RVNU	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.19%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	—	—

RVNU vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RVNU vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.51%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVNU and CN in my portfolio?

RVNU and CN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RVNU or CN?

On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVNU or CN?

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVNU or CN?

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between RVNU and CN?

RVNU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CN is China Equities. RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.50% for CN.