PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVNU vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RVNU vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than HYMB's 2.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RVNU has underperformed HYMB with an annualized return of 1.91%, while HYMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.46% annualized return.


RVNU

1D
0.08%
1M
1.22%
YTD
3.76%
6M
3.09%
1Y
10.00%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
1.91%

HYMB

1D
0.12%
1M
1.11%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.22%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVNU vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.76%0.58%1.46%11.19%-16.60%2.28%6.54%10.16%-0.56%8.24%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.91%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RVNU and HYMB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.43

The correlation between RVNU and HYMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RVNU vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVNU vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVNUHYMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.86

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.66

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.29

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.95

8.12

+2.83

RVNU vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVNU Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVNU and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVNUHYMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.86

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.07

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.22

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.45

-0.06

Drawdowns

RVNU vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and HYMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RVNUHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-29.57%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-3.11%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-7.44%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-20.15%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

-29.57%

+6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

0.00%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-3.81%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.88%

-0.05%

Volatility

RVNU vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) at 1.36%. This indicates that RVNU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RVNUHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.36%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

3.16%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.20%

4.07%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

6.66%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.28%

11.36%

-4.08%

RVNU vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RVNU vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.51%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


RVNU and HYMB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVNU has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to HYMB (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVNU dropped -23.51% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

On 10-year performance, HYMB leads with 2.46% vs 1.91% for RVNU. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYMB has performed better with a 2.46% return vs 1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.51% for RVNU.

RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.35% for HYMB.

RVNU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RVNU and HYMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer