RVNL vs. GRAG
RVNL (GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF) and GRAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RVNL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRAG.
Performance
RVNL vs. GRAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RVNL having a -44.58% return and GRAG slightly lower at -45.71%.
RVNL
- 1D
- -6.91%
- 1M
- 13.94%
- 6M
- -41.25%
- YTD
- -44.58%
- 1Y
- -2.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRAG
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- 39.46%
- 6M
- -41.95%
- YTD
- -45.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNL vs. GRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF | -44.58% | 19.51% |
GRAG Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF | -45.71% | -5.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNL and GRAG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNL vs. GRAG — Risk / Return Rank
RVNL
GRAG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RVNL vs. GRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RVNL | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RVNL vs. GRAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNL drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than GRAG's maximum drawdown of -65.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNL and GRAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNL | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -65.33% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.50% | -51.08% | -6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -42.73% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.45% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNL vs. GRAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNL | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.21% | 70.55% | +69.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 132.36% | 70.55% | +61.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.36% | 70.55% | +61.81% |
RVNL vs. GRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GRAG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVNL vs. GRAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither RVNL nor GRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNL and GRAG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for RVNL.
RVNL and GRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for RVNL and 0.75% for GRAG.
Find the right allocation for RVNL and GRAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer