RVER vs. USPX
RVER (Trenchless Fund ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RVER is actively managed, while USPX is passively managed. Over the past year, RVER returned 24.60% vs 27.42% for USPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVER charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
RVER vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVER achieves a 18.77% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 10.64% return.
RVER
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 22.28%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
RVER vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 18.77% | 5.68% | 17.75% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 10.64% | 17.78% | 13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVER and USPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between RVER and USPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
RVER vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RVER
USPX
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
RVER
USPX
Energy
RVER
USPX
Communication Services
RVER
USPX
Industrials
RVER
USPX
Healthcare
RVER
USPX
Financial Services
RVER
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
RVER
USPX
Basic Materials
RVER
USPX
Consumer Defensive
RVER
-
USPX
Real Estate
RVER
-
USPX
Utilities
RVER
-
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVER vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
RVER
USPX
RVER vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVER | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 3.01 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.13 | 13.72 | -10.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVER | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.28 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.80 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
RVER vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVER drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVER and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVER | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.21% | -31.21% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.61% | -9.15% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -0.75% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -4.44% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 2.00% | +5.88% |
Volatility
RVER vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) at 2.87%. This indicates that RVER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVER | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 2.87% | +5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.39% | 9.16% | +9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 12.09% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.40% | 16.17% | +10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.40% | 15.92% | +10.48% |
RVER vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVER has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVER vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
RVER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than USPX's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF | 1.44% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVER and USPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVER has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to USPX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVER dropped -26.21% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 1-year performance, USPX leads with 27.42% vs 24.60% for RVER. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, USPX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USPX has performed better with a 27.42% return vs 24.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RVER.
RVER has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.04% for USPX.
They also come from different issuers: River1 and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RVER and 0.03% for USPX.
USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RVER and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer