RVER vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RVER (Trenchless Fund ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RVER is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, RVER returned 17.51% vs 53.10% for NRSH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVER charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

RVER vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVER achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 43.75% return.

RVER

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 6M: 10.20%
• 1Y: 17.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 43.75%
• 6M: 40.21%
• 1Y: 53.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVER vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF	11.38%	5.68%	18.88%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	43.75%	12.95%	-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RVER and NRSH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.57

The correlation between RVER and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

RVER vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RVER	NRSH
Technology	60.8%	36.7%
Basic Materials	9.9%	-
Energy	9.3%	2.5%
Industrials	7.3%	57.9%
Communication Services	6.7%	-
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Financial Services	4.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.4%

Return for Risk

RVER vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVER

RVER Risk / Return Rank: 21
RVER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RVER Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RVER Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RVER Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RVER Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 72
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVER vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RVER	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	2.05	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	2.68	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.34	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	4.88	-4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.19	14.81	-12.63

RVER vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVER Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVER and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RVER vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVER drawdown since its inception was -26.21%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVER and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVER	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.21%	-24.01%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.61%	-10.94%	-10.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.46%	-3.08%	-5.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-5.56%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.03%	3.59%	+4.44%

Volatility

RVER vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) have volatilities of 10.33% and 10.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVER	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	10.49%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	21.77%	-2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.21%	26.00%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.42%	22.07%	+4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.42%	22.07%	+4.35%

RVER vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RVER has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RVER vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

RVER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than NRSH's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.29%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%
RVER Trenchless Fund ETF	1.53%	1.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVER and NRSH in my portfolio?

RVER and NRSH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVER or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to RVER (10.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVER dropped -26.21% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, RVER or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 53.10% vs 17.51% for RVER. On fees, RVER is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, RVER has been the lower-risk option at 10.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RVER or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 53.10% return vs 17.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RVER or NRSH?

RVER is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RVER or NRSH?

RVER has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.29% for NRSH.

What is the main difference between RVER and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: River1 and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RVER and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.