RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L
RUSG.L (Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - RUSG.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index, while XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RUSG.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.
Performance
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RUSG.L is traded in USD, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
RUSG.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- —
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.09% | 43.28% | -30.45% | 26.50% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.60% | 20.14% | 26.48% | 55.63% | -33.41% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUSG.L and XNAQ.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between RUSG.L and XNAQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Communication Services
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Financial Services
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Healthcare
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Consumer Defensive
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Industrials
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Basic Materials
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Real Estate
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Energy
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Utilities
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
RUSG.L
XNAQ.L
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUSG.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.85 | — |
Drawdowns
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUSG.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.77% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -8.65% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUSG.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.37% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.38% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.43% | — |
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUSG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RUSG.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RUSG.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RUSG.L and XNAQ.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RUSG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RUSG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
RUSG.L is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XNAQ.L is Nasdaq-100. RUSG.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth Net Index, while XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for RUSG.L and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
Find the right allocation for RUSG.L and XNAQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer