XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
XNAQ.L and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both XNAQ.L and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XNAQ.L or CNDX.L.
Performance
XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAQ.L achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 21.52% return.
XNAQ.L
22.66%
4.66%
11.15%
28.39%
N/A
N/A
CNDX.L
21.52%
0.68%
10.53%
30.09%
20.19%
17.74%
Key characteristics
| XNAQ.L | CNDX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 1.75 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.41 | 2.39 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.30 | 2.34 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.99 | 8.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.02% | 3.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.87% | 16.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.52% | -35.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -2.94% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between XNAQ.L and CNDX.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
XNAQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAQ.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAQ.L and CNDX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XNAQ.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) is 4.93%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that XNAQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.