RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RUSG.L (Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and R1GB.L (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - RUSG.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index while R1GB.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. Both are passively managed. RUSG.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for R1GB.L.

Performance

RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RUSG.L is traded in USD, while R1GB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R1GB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

RUSG.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

R1GB.L

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 25.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
R1GB.L iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc	6.38%	17.73%	-15.89%

Return for Risk

RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R1GB.L

R1GB.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
R1GB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
R1GB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
R1GB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
R1GB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
R1GB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RUSG.L	R1GB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.11	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RUSG.L	R1GB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.80%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.54%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.26%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RUSG.L	R1GB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.68%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.68%	—

RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RUSG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than R1GB.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RUSG.L vs. R1GB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RUSG.L nor R1GB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, RUSG.L or R1GB.L?

On fees, R1GB.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RUSG.L or R1GB.L?

R1GB.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for RUSG.L.

What is the main difference between RUSG.L and R1GB.L?

RUSG.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth Net Index, while R1GB.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for RUSG.L and 0.18% for R1GB.L.