R1GB.L vs. NESG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L).
R1GB.L and NESG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. R1GB.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2023. NESG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 ESG Index®. It was launched on Oct 25, 2021. Both R1GB.L and NESG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
R1GB.L iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | -8.60% | 9.47% | -13.92% |
NESG.L Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -4.15% | 12.47% | 5.53% |
Different Trading Currencies
R1GB.L is traded in GBP, while NESG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NESG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1GB.L achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than NESG.L's -4.15% return.
R1GB.L
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 6M
- -6.92%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NESG.L
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1GB.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NESG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1GB.L
NESG.L
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) and Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| R1GB.L | NESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.15 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.68 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.91 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 5.47 | -2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| R1GB.L | NESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.15 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.55 | -0.87 |
Correlation
The correlation between R1GB.L and NESG.L is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither R1GB.L nor NESG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1GB.L drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than NESG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1GB.L and NESG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1GB.L | NESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | -34.69% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -12.01% | -3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.18% | -8.22% | -5.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -9.41% | -6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 3.38% | +1.90% |
Volatility
R1GB.L vs. NESG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) is 4.59%, while Invesco NASDAQ-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (NESG.L) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that R1GB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| R1GB.L | NESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 5.92% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 12.72% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 19.81% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 21.74% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 21.74% | +3.56% |