RUNN vs. MIDE
RUNN (Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF) and MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. RUNN is actively managed, while MIDE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RUNN returned 7.77%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for MIDE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RUNN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MIDE.
Performance
RUNN vs. MIDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUNN achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than MIDE's 15.01% return.
RUNN
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- -2.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIDE
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- —
RUNN vs. MIDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | -1.14% | 2.30% | 17.16% | 11.90% |
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 15.01% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 9.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUNN and MIDE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RUNN and MIDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RUNN vs. MIDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RUNN
MIDE
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
RUNN
MIDE
Technology
RUNN
MIDE
Healthcare
RUNN
MIDE
Financial Services
RUNN
MIDE
Consumer Cyclical
RUNN
MIDE
Basic Materials
RUNN
MIDE
Communication Services
RUNN
MIDE
Consumer Defensive
RUNN
-
MIDE
Energy
RUNN
-
MIDE
Real Estate
RUNN
-
MIDE
Utilities
RUNN
-
MIDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUNN vs. MIDE — Risk / Return Rank
RUNN
MIDE
RUNN vs. MIDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) and Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RUNN | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.25 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 2.36 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 8.38 | -8.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RUNN vs. MIDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUNN drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, smaller than the maximum MIDE drawdown of -24.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUNN and MIDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUNN | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.83% | -24.59% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -9.36% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | -24.59% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.13% | -1.51% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -6.38% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 2.64% | +2.32% |
Volatility
RUNN vs. MIDE - Volatility Comparison
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) at 3.47%. This indicates that RUNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUNN | MIDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 3.47% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 11.65% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 16.00% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 19.68% | -5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 19.58% | -5.77% |
RUNN vs. MIDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUNN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MIDE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RUNN vs. MIDE - Dividend Comparison
RUNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than MIDE's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.26% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% |
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RUNN and MIDE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RUNN has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to MIDE (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUNN dropped -16.83% vs MIDE's -24.59%.
On 3-year performance, MIDE leads with 13.92% vs 7.77% for RUNN. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MIDE has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RUNN.
MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.56% for RUNN.
They also come from different issuers: Running Oak Capital and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RUNN and 0.15% for MIDE.
MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RUNN and MIDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer