RTYY vs. FBL
RTYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for FBL.
Performance
RTYY vs. FBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTYY achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -14.12% return.
RTYY
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBL
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- 30.22%
- 6M
- -8.94%
- YTD
- -14.12%
- 1Y
- -33.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTYY vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF | 0.99% | -14.43% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -14.12% | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTYY and FBL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTYY vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank
RTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBL
RTYY vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF (RTYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTYY | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTYY vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTYY drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYY and FBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTYY | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -61.15% | +38.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -61.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.97% | -44.34% | +30.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -17.49% | +6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.05% | — |
Volatility
RTYY vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTYY | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.47% | 77.12% | -47.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 72.36% | -42.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 72.36% | -42.89% |
RTYY vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTYY vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison
RTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 110.50%, more than FBL's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 2.41% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF | 110.50% | 13.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTYY and FBL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RTYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RTYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FBL.
RTYY has the higher dividend yield at 110.50%, compared with 2.41% for FBL.
RTYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RTYY and 1.09% for FBL.
Find the right allocation for RTYY and FBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer